Tuesday, May 19, 2009

LINKS FOR MY BROTHER TO RESEARCH!

Big Brother wants to take our rights away, invade our privacy, censor us, and tax us to death, and take our gun rights away... Please read/research the following links:

http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=1987

The above link is in reference to a boy with cancer whose family has Native American like beliefs and use Natural Medicines...They do not believe in Chemotherapy/Radiation...Which is basically poison which kills good and bad cells..
So this jerk, Judge John Rodenberg is threatening to take the child away from the family and place him in temporary state custody...Do you really want Gubment to take over Healthcare? Here's a quote from the article:

"If chemotherapy is ordered and the family refuses, the judge said, Daniel will be placed in temporary custody. It was unclear how the medicine would be administered if the boy fights it, which he said he would do, according to his court testimony unsealed on Friday."
Below is Judge John Rodenberg pic/info

Brown County Courthouse
Phone: (507) 233-6670


NEXT ISSUE:

Former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson basically strong armed Bank CEO's into taking government bailout money or risk ruthless audits...Uhh isn't that called extortion?.. Which references an older blog I wrote how Federal Government snuck in the back door beginning with obtaining preferred stock of private banks then liquidating it into Common Stock...meaning the Federal Gubment now has a vote and say in the business transactions of Bank of America etc..Here's the link: http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=1926

NEXT ISSUE:

Here is a link with a brief but informed look at the dangers of the Federal Reserve:
http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=1909

NEXT ISSUE:
Obama needs a bailout to bailout his original bailout plan..WTF? :
http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=1902

NEXT ISSUE:

H.R. 2159 sneaky proposed gun control legislation summed up well in this quote and subsequent link:

" According to World Net Daily, May 9, 2009, “A new gun law being considered in Congress, if aligned with Department of Homeland Security memos labeling everyday Americans a potential ‘threats,’ could potentially deny firearms to pro-lifers, gun-rights advocates, tax protesters, animal rights activists, and a host of others–any already on the expansive DHS watch list for potential ‘extremism.’

“Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., has sponsored H.R. 2159, the Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2009, which permits the attorney general to deny transfer of a firearm to any ‘known or suspected dangerous terrorist.’ The bill requires only that the potential firearm transferee is ‘appropriately suspected’ of preparing for a terrorist act and that the attorney general ‘has a reasonable belief’ that the gun might be used in connection with terrorism.

“Gun rights advocates, however, object to the bill’s language, arguing that it enables the federal government to suspend a person’s Second Amendment rights without any trial or legal proof and only upon suspicion of being ‘dangerous.’”

WND quotes Gun Owners of America Executive Director Larry Pratt as saying, “By [DHS] standards, I’m one of [DHS Secretary] Janet Napolitano’s terrorists. This bill would enable the attorney general to put all of the people who voted against Obama on no-gun lists, because according to the DHS, they’re all potential terrorists. Actually, we could rename this bill the Janet Napolitano Frenzied Fantasy Implementation Act of 2009.” "

http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=1881

NEXT ISSUE:

What the hell is the Federal Govt doing changing the language of this to state they own all bodies of water?
http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=1813



NEXT ISSUE:

These are the kind of bumper stickers I have on my car...What happened to Freedom of Expression?
http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=1799

NEXT ISSUE:
Here's a good article explaining how United Nations legislature would supercede the Constitution and dictate how we parent our children:
http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=1796

NEXT ISSUE:
Here is the story about how my blog should be made illegal cuz it might make someone "uncomfortable" http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=1768

Next issue:
Good article demonstrating the Federal Govt. beginning to police and vilify their own citizens
http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=1730

NEXT ISSUE:
Who are those mysterious Bilderburg guys?
http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=1999 Timothy Geithner our US Sec of Treasury?!...who was previously President of Federal Reserve Bank of NY

NEXT ISSUE:

Barney Frank...He really deserves his own article...I will expand upon this later.. Umm so Barney votes sensibly then suddenly realizes that he has just potentially taken tax payer funded dollars away from Obama's mob for hire group ACORN and changes his mind:
http://www.minnpost.com/cynthiadizikes/2009/05/07/8659/barney_frank_prevails_in_mortgage_amendment_showdown_with_michele_bachmann

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/14/california-wants-a-piece-of-tarp/

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123258284337504295.html


And for good measure...read this article about how Obama will not ban guns but will legislate them out of existence with some help from the United Nations....

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/baldwin/090424

4 comments:

brandonfuller316 said...

Why did authorities get involved in the case of the boy with chemo? There must have been justification for the boy's medical care to be determined by the courts. The website takes parts of news stories and does not give you the full story. There are radical members of congress that draft legislation as a publicity stunt with no real chance of passing. Whispers of UN taking over US are unrealistic and absurd. Why would UN law supersede US laws and regulations? We ignored UN laws and acts in the 2nd Iraq war so why would the US suddenly follow the UN commands? One should always question the motives of "news" websites on the internet. Websites like these spread false truths and hear say bs....just my point of view

Fortunate Son said...

Explain possible justification for the Federal Govt. telling you what type of medicine to take for your ailment...That should be left for your physician..and if you or your families refuse it..Then that is your right..Jehovah's Witness refuse blood transfusions all the time..that is their religious belief..even though it would save their life.. You must respect personal freedoms and choice..Why does the Federal Govt. want to make choices for us?

brandonfuller316 said...

What about if you were a child whose parents believed it was okay for young children to have sex and belonged to a cult that promoted inbreeding? The courts are speaking up for children that can't speak up for themselves. The government can't make any adult in their right mind go to chemo or take a blood transfusion...don't try to warp this case into freedom of religion case..

Fortunate Son said...

I ask you to take a step back...remove your own personal views or political ideals..look at all of these situations with logic and rationale..Doesn't seem kinda strange..go back to Invading Iraq although no foreign army stepped foot on our soil, go back and read the Patriot Act giving Federal Govt. power over the State's National Guard and stripping Individual Citizen's privacy via wiretapping and martial law..,then the MIAC report, then American taxpayer dollars used to bailout PRIVATE companies..Don't all of the above situations seem like an Aggressive Seize of Power by the Federal Govt? This is not a Democrat or Republican thing... This is a Constitution and individual rights versus Big Brother Bloated Federal Govt. thing...