Center for Disease Control (CDC)
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently informed the public that diagnostic testing for influenza will not clarify between the different strains of flu, including H1N1, in most cases.
This story needs to go viral because the Center for Disease Control [CDC] is publically acknowledging on it's own web site that they will not implement a program to test ANYONE (except in a few select cases) to determine scientifically if the flu strickened patient has H1N1, or test ANYONE to determine if the flu strickened patient has died from the H1N1 virus, during the swine flu level 6 pandemic of 2009.
The implications of this policy is staggering. A few of the multiple questions that are raised by this mysterious CDC admission are: How reliable can the CDC H1N1 flu strickened patient reports be? How reliable can the CDC H1N1 flu lethality reports be? Without 'the most accurate laboratory test, such as 'real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR)' test being done on everyone with flu symptoms, how will health officials, the World Health Organization [WHO] and the world governments know how prevalent the H1N1 swine flu epidemic really is? If the 'regular' seasonal flu and the H1N1 flu symptoms are so similar that it is impossible to tell them apart, and/or if 'the rapid influenza diagnostic test results vary from 10% to 70% in their ability to detect flu viruses, let alone distinguish between a seasonal virus and a H1N1 virus, how can medical authorities and, we, the public, determine if the swine flu is responsible for the pandemic or some other factor caused the disease or death?
Legislators are passing laws to force vaccinate us with an experimental vaccine of which clinical trials to determine their safety and effectiveness are fast tracted to obtain a license in a state of emergency, and there will be no scientific method to verify that these extraordinary measures in the name of public health are justified. This perplexing ambiguity raises two ultimate questions as to whether or not there is a more sinister motive behind this CDC directive: Is the logistics of comprehensive H1N1 testing prohibitive or is the H1N1 vaccine more dangerous than the H1N1 virus? Lack of substantive testing for the H1N1 virus by specialized laboratories would certainly limit the probability that the H1N1 virus would scientifically be proven a weaponized virus, rather than a virus that mutated naturally. Lack of substantive testing for the H1N1 virus by specialized laboratories would also limit the probability that the H1N1 vaccine would scientifically be proven the source of the pandemic.
This is an email that was forwarded to me...
2 comments:
You said:
"Lack of substantive testing for the H1N1 virus by specialized laboratories would certainly limit the probability that the H1N1 virus would scientifically be proven a weaponized virus, rather than a virus that mutated naturally."
How so? A directive AGAINST substantive testing could indicate they already know it IS a weapon.
I think the wording of your last two sentences is problematic, but overall you're correct in that they could disprove any theories about the vaccine being the cause of a pandemic if they would test more people. I believe that's the point you were making. (Good point, by the way.)
Post a Comment